Plan Bay Area meetings are rigged, include Brown Act violations and violence against citizens

As a taxpayer and resident of the Bay Area, I object to regional planners such as ABAG (Association of Bay Area Governments) and MTC (Metropolitan Transportation Committee) planning where and how myself and 9 million other Bay Area residents will live, work, commute and recreate over the next 30 years. Under the guise of eliminating greenhouse gasses, these plans call for punitive actions against car owners and violate private property rights. These regional agencies are advocating for policies that would render the value of private property for many worthless.< --more-->

Two favorite methods to violate private property rights by these unelected new bureaucratic overlords are to 1) advocate for the administrative taking of private property through shrinking urban growth boundaries; and 2) rezoning to open space as eminent domain is too obvious a measure.

These are administrative “takings” as they adversely affect private property use and values without the “physical” taking of the property. Administrative taking is worse than eminent domain because there is no just compensation to the land owner. The land owner is left with a property that is severely limited in its value and use.

This is all part of SB375 “Sustainable Communities Strategy”, which calls for regional planners to plan how and where we all will live over the next 30 years. This plan only allows for high density, stack-and-pack housing next to mass transit without regard for the current use, zoning, and ownership of the properties where these stack-and-pack villages will be located.

Land use and local policies are exclusively the responsibility of local and citizens and their legislators. This plan circumvents local planning and punishes local jurisdictions who do not adopt these policies by withholding desperately needed transportation funding.

This amounts to extortion! Local planning should be done locally without threat of funds being withheld by regional or state agencies. Not only that but, if local jurisdictions don’t identify PDA (Priority Development Areas) and rezone them to mixed multi-use they can be sued for non-compliance.

These are just a few of the tactics the regional planners don’t tell you and don’t want you to know. They say what’s the big deal? All we are doing is making a plan? Local jurisdictions will still be in charge of the local decisions…. Yes, but they know that all of these punitive measures will force local jurisdictions to cave to the pressure.

Local planning has completely been usurped along with our local redevelopment funds. State funding through IFDs (Infrastructure Finance Districts) will be the new funding stick… I mean arm to make sure local jurisdictions play ball. When will our local officials stand together against this takeover? Can’t they see that they have lost control?

The Plan/One Bay Area initiative is filled with false and inaccurate statistics and predictions regarding population growth, jobs, environmental impact, and more. Several local Bay Area jurisdictions have emphatically announced that ABAG and MTC’s data is highly inflated and not based on reality. This does not seem to dissuade the planners at MTC and ABAG. They continue to plan without real data to make meaningful decisions.

Extreme groups including Greenbelt Alliance and Transform are strategic partners with ABAG and MTC, and are conspiring to eliminate the public from discussions and forums on the Plan/One Bay Area initiative. MTC/ABAG and these groups are intent on eliminating concerned citizens from public meetings and stacking meetings with pro Plan Bay Area shills. In addition, these groups have been given inside information on the planning process while concerned citizens have been denied the information.

ABAG and MTC have violated the Brown Act open meetings law by requiring the public to pre-register for their “visioning meetings.” They also violated the Act by requiring registrants to designate their role, such as concerned citizen, small government advocate, social justice advocate, environmental justice advocate, and the like.

Labels are then used to prescreen attendees, with social justice and environmental advocates given immediate attendance confirmations, while concerned citizens and small government advocates were never given registration confirmations. The latter groups were ultimately advised that the meeting capacities were full and they could not attend.

These meetings are clearly stacked against the public. After numerous complaints to the DOT (Department of Transportation), FTA (Federal Transit Authority) and others, the concerned public was finally given registration confirmations. But meetings were restricted to 100 attendees and stacked with pro One Bay Area groups.

MTC and ABAG are misleading the public and are withholding relevant information. When pressed for details the public is told there is no specific plan. MTC and ABAG refuse to answer specific questions from concerned citizens about cost, jobs, what is social justice, and why developers will receive CEQA waivers.

They fill meeting time with ambiguous information and meaningless videos, and then claim they have insufficient time for questions and public input. Breakout meetings are segregated between pro Bay Area shills and concerned citizens. Without enough information to form a rational decision they ask attendees to vote.

Police are unwitting accomplices. They are falsely told that attendees opposing are violent and should be controlled. In fact, those who have experienced the violence inflicted on them are the concerned citizens seeking to have questions answered. At the Dublin meeting, an MTC staffer assaulted me while I was trying to ask a question. At the Santa Rosa meeting, a woman who was asking a question was repeatedly assaulted by a man with a chair. At the Contra Costa meeting, a woman came across the room and threatened to assault me with a cane after the meeting for speaking out against the plan.

MTC, ABAG and the police did not take any action against the perpetrators of this intimidation and battery. When a government employee can get away with assaulting a citizen with impunity you know things are way off the rails.

The entire process is rigged and should be STOPPED! This process does not allow for real public input into this initiative. We demand open, public and honest debate on this issue. STOP the Plan and investigate the Brown Act violations now. The 9 million citizens of the Bay Area deserve to have a voice.

Berkeley Lab selects Richmond Field for bioscience research site

The University of California announced today that it has identified the Richmond Field Station as its preferred site for the proposed consolidation of the biosciences programs of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab). The University of California-owned site presents the best opportunity to solve the Lab’s pressing space problems while allowing for long term growth and maintaining the 80 year tradition of close cooperation with the UC Berkeley Campus. Continue reading

Is Pittsburg getting short end of Contra Costa prisoner reentry program?

A reader used our contact form to send the following missive asking about the Contra Costa prisoner reentry program adopted by Contra Costa County Supervisors in March 2011. Is Pittsburg getting the short end of the needle? And if so, why? Is Supervisor Glover ignoring citizen input and instead simply hooking up local supporters with his slush fund from the Keller Canyon slush fund? Continue reading

Exposing the Lie that is One Bay Area

Unelected regional planners such as ABAG (Association of Bay Area Governments) and MTC (Metropolitan Transportation Committee) are trying to regulate where and how more than 9 million Bay Area residents will live, work, commute and recreate. Under the guise of eliminating greenhouse gasses, they are trying to regulate car ownership, control use of private open space, and designate what developers can build and where.  City planners are abdicating their responsibility by allowing these regional boards the authority to make decisions that should be made at the City or County level with input from local citizens. Continue reading

Lamorinda Democrats hear talk on California Education woes

The Thursday night meeting of the Lamorinda Democrats featured their President – Craig Cheslog speaking about California Education as well as his position within the Superintendent Torlakason’s offices at Sacramento. There was a host of bullet points and issues covered from the basic office structure (the lobby receptionist also reports to him) these were some of the salient features that echoed in my concerns for our children’s future. Continue reading

What should replace Mt Diablo Health Care District?

Drive out one demon and 10 take its place. That’s a possibility after the Contra Costa County Local agency formation commission (LAFCO) voted unanimously to dissolve the worthless Mt Diablo Healthcare District. Whether or not the district sues to protect its petty existence is one thing. What agency should replace it is now a question for LAFCO and affected communities to decide. Continue reading

Jeb Bush endorses Ricky Gill for GOP nomination in CA-09 v McNerney

jeb bush endorses ricky gill for gop nomination for congress in ca-09 v democrat jerry mcnerneyFormer Florida Governor Jeb Bush today announced his endorsement of Congressional candidate After campaigning for Gill earlier this week in Northern California, Bush praised the candidate’s experience and vision. The new California Congressional District 9, currently represented by Democrat Jerry McNerney, shifted East during the recent rejiggering of state and congressional district. District 9 now includes Lodi and Stockton areas, including Oakley, Brentwood, and parts of Antioch and Pittsburg. Continue reading